Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242190›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025

2023 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome: good for patients or good for papers?

Katrien M J Devreese

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Katrien M J DevreeseCoagulation Laboratory, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a new set of robust criteria, including clinical and laboratory criteria, to enhance the identification of patients in clinical studies and laboratory research. Based on a scoring system, patients accruing at least 3 points in the clinical and laboratory domains fulfill the classification criteria for APS. They are meant to define homogeneous patient groups for research. They are not to be used in a clinical setting for diagnosis to identify every patient with APS, where it is essential to include those with an atypical clinical presentation and/or antiphospholipid antibodies laboratory test result. These criteria have provoked a debate among workers in the field. Without nuance, the classification criteria cannot be used for diagnosing APS and may be a potential pitfall for clinicians when no difference is made between "classification" and "diagnostic" criteria. Complementing the American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria with the recently available International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis guidance on laboratory detection and interpretation of antiphospholipid antibodies for diagnosis of APS has added value. It ensures rigorous research that leads to improvement of patient management and optimal clinical care in routine practice.

Indexed as

antiphospholipid syndromeclassificationclinicaldiagnosislaboratorypatient careresearch

Identifiers

PMID40242190
PMCPMC12002647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.