Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40242188›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025

Return to driving following rotator cuff repair: 23%, 70% and 99% at 1, 2 and 6 months.

Maxime Antoni, Mohamed Zaibi, ReSurg, Florent Baldairon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maxime AntoniClinique de l'Orangerie Strasbourg France.
Mohamed ZaibiClinique de l'Orangerie Strasbourg France.
ReSurg
Florent BaldaironClinique du Sport Bordeaux-Merignac France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To report the rate and time of return to driving during the first 12 months following rotator cuff repair (RCR), and to determine the influence of preoperative factors on return to driving. Methods: The authors retrospectively collected the records of patients that underwent RCR for superior (isolated supraspinatus), anterosuperior (supraspinatus + subscapularis), posterosuperior (supraspinatus + infraspinatus), and 3-tendon tears between 2021 and 2022. Patients were excluded if they had bilateral RCR, previous ipsilateral shoulder surgery, or any discomfort at the contralateral shoulder, and a total of 151 patients (151 shoulders) met the inclusion criteria. Of the initial cohort of 151 patients, six did not drive, eight required reoperation, and nine were lost to follow-up. This left a final cohort of 128 patients aged 59.1 ± 7.6 years (range, 35-79), of which most were males (61%), and drove manual cars (70%). Most patients had a superior tear (53%) and had their right side operated (69%). The authors noted patient demographics, surgical data, and pre- and postoperative driving details, as well as the Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) at 6 and 12 months. Results: Following rotator cuff repair 23% of patients returned to driving at 1 month, 70% at 2 months and 99% at 6 months. The time to return to driving less than 5 km of 7.3 ± 4.8 weeks (range, 0.5-26). Univariable analysis revealed that earlier return to driving was associated with male sex ( Conclusions: Rotator cuff repair enables 23% of patients to return to driving at 1 month, 70% at 2 months, and 99% at 6 months. Male sex, patients with automatic cars, and distance driven per week preoperatively were indicators for earlier return to driving. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Indexed as

automatic cardrivingmanual carrotator cuff repairrotator cuff tear

Identifiers

PMID40242188
PMCPMC12002080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.