ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Meat species authentication using portable hyperspectral imaging.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilization of nanosensors and nanomaterials to revolutionize the food industry: boosting product safety, quality, and sustainability.RSC advances · 2026Review
- AI-Driven Nondestructive Measurement Technologies for Meat Quality and Safety: A Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Spectroscopy and Imaging Techniques for Nondestructive Detection of Meat Quality and Safety.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Meat species fraud seriously harms the interests of consumers and causes food safety problems. Hyperspectral imaging is capable of integrating spectral and imaging technology to simultaneously obtain spectral and spatial information, and has been widely applied to detect adulteration and authenticity of meat. Methods: This study aims to develop a portable hyperspectral imager (HSI) and a discrimination model for meat adulteration detection. The portable push broom HSI was designed with the spectral resolution of 5 nm and spatial resolution of 0.1 mm, and controlled with the Raspberry Pi to meet the requirement of on situ rapid detection. To improve generalization, the model transfer method was also developed to achieve model sharing across instruments, providing a reliable solution for rapid assessment of meat species. Results: The results demonstrate that the model transfer method can effectively correct the spectral differences due to instrument variation and improve the robustness of the model. The support vector machine (SVM) classifier combined with spectral space transformation (SST) achieved a best accuracy of 94.91%. Additionally, a visualization map was proposed to provide the distribution of meat adulteration, offering valuable insights for fraud detection. Conclusion: The portable HSI enables on-site analysis, making it an invaluable tool for various industries, including food safety and quality control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.