ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
National team biathletes' experiences of the menstrual cycle: "it's something that needs to be heard".
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Young Investigator Award: Where Do We Start? A Conceptual Model for Implementing Menstrual Cycle Tracking in Sport.European journal of sport science · 2026Review
- The impact of menstrual cycle phase and symptoms on sleep, recovery, and stress in elite female basketball athletes: a longitudinal study.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To describe national team biathletes' experiences of their menstrual cycle (MC) while training and competing, and to identify factors to be considered in the development of policy and practice to support these athletes. Methods: Participants included 18 national team biathletes (ages 17-32 years) who experience the MC. Following a qualitative description design, athletes participated in one-on-one semistructured interviews that were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a content analysis process. Results: Four descriptive themes represent the findings: (a) 'A very under-rated part of performance and training': Critical impacts of the MC on sport; (b) 'It varies month to month': Fluctuation in occurrence and impact of MC symptoms; (c) 'Block out and get through it': Managing the MC for performance; and (d) 'For the next generation': Improving policy and practice around the MC. Findings from this research outline actionable steps to support athletes who experience a MC, including developing mandatory MC education, increasing knowledge about the management of MC symptoms (eg, MC tracking, leakproof suits), and creating a fair point system of the overall biathlon season ranking allowing elimination of two race results that may have been affected by a health issue, such as adverse MC symptoms. Conclusions: This research outlines the critical need for 'macro' level policies and practices that reduce the perceived impact of MC symptoms on athletes' training and performance. Furthermore, individual variations described in this study highlight the importance of individualised approaches to supporting athletes as they navigate the MC alongside the demands of sport.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.