ArticleJPRAS open2025
What degree of deformity resulting from upper auricular wedge resection in elderly patients is acceptable?
Article in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Auricular malignant tumors are common in elderly patients; therefore, there is a need to establish a simple reconstructive surgery. This study aimed to determine the extent to which surgical wedge resection can be used in elderly patients with auricular malignant tumors. Patients and Methods: Clinical photographs were taken of three elderly patients (case 1: age 75 years, defect 15 mm; case 2: age 93 years, defect 30 mm; case 3: age 88 years, defect 35 mm) who underwent wedge resection and simple suture for squamous cell carcinoma of the upper part of the ear and were evaluated by 28 plastic surgeons. The following evaluation items were rated on a 5-point scale: balance, length, width, standing and curvature of the auricular region. Results: In case 1 (15-mm defect), the 75th percentile of length, width, and erection was less than 1 point (within the acceptable range). However, overall balance and curvature were less than 2 points (within the acceptable range only for elderly patients). In cases 2 and 3 (defects: 30-35-mm), the 75th percentiles of overall balance, length, width, and erection were less than 2 points, while in case 3, the curvature exceeded 2 points. The average scores for each item in case 1 were generally less than 1 point, and the average scores for all items in cases 2 and 3 were less than 2 points. Discussion and Conclusion: This study suggests that only simple suturing is cosmetically acceptable for ear defects of approximately 30 mm in elderly patients, representing significantly reduced surgical invasiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.