ArticlePreventive medicine reports2025
Suicides in China's scientific community: A call for a public health response.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Suicide among academics and students has emerged as a critical public health issue in China. This article seeks to contribute to a public health approach to suicide prevention specifically tailored to China's scientific community. Methods: We created a unique database through a systematic search and hand-coding of media reports on suicide cases within China's scientific community. Our search (summer, 2024) resulted in a cross-verified database of 130 unique cases from 1992 to 2024. We analyzed suicide patterns based on the year of occurrence, age, gender, academic rank, methods, field, and reported reasons. Results: Our data suggest that suicide numbers among Chinese academics have increased over time, with jumping from heights identified as the predominant method. The causes of these suicides were multifaceted and gendered. Additionally, media coverage of these cases appears to have changed over time, shifting from portraying suicide solely as an individual health struggle to framing it as a broader social issue. Drawing on our analysis as well as recent developments in literature, we outlined four urgent actions to prevent and mitigate suicides among academics in China: 1) Formally recognize the growing suicide crisis within the scientific community as a public health issue. 2) Address upstream political, social, cultural, and economic causes. 3) Document data and research suicide patterns. 4) Foster a healthier, more supportive academic environment through collective action. Conclusions: The rising number of suicide cases in Chinese academia are not isolated incidents but rather reflect systemic issues within the academic and sociopolitical environment. A public health response that enhances our understanding of root causes and informs targeted interventions is urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.