ArticleHealth care science2025
Feasibility and Safety of a Novel Cable-Transmitted Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy System for Upper Gastrointestinal Examination.
Article in Health care science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel cable-transmitted magnetically controlled capsule endoscopy (CT-MCE) system for upper gastrointestinal examination. Methods: Twenty-six participants (19 healthy volunteers and seven patients with gastrointestinal symptoms) willing to undergo upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were recruited. Each participant underwent CT-MCE followed by conventional gastroscopy within 24 h. Maneuverability and visibility of the CT-MCE capsule in the upper gastrointestinal tract, adverse events, and discomfort during the procedure were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of CT-MCE for diagnosing upper gastrointestinal lesions were evaluated using conventional gastroscopy findings as the standard. Results: Maneuverability was graded as "good" for all segments of the esophagus. The percentage of participants in which maneuverability was good according to gastric region was as follows: cardia (100.00%), pylorus (96.15%), angulus (92.31%), antrum (88.46%), fundus (84.62%), and body (73.08%). In the duodenal bulb and descending duodenum, it was good in only 20.83% and 16.67% of participants, respectively. Visibility was graded as "excellent" or "good" in the esophagus, Z line, and duodenal bulb in all participants; excellent/good visibility was achieved in the stomach and descending duodenum in 96.15% and 79.17% of participants, respectively. Forty-one lesions were detected overall. The sensitivity and specificity of CT-MCE in diagnosing upper gastrointestinal lesions were 85.00% and 98.15%, respectively. The CT-MCE capsule was successfully removed through the mouth in all participants. No serious adverse events or capsule retention occurred. Conclusions: CT-MCE showed good feasibility and safety for upper gastrointestinal examination. The system was effective in examining the esophagus and stomach with no risk of capsule retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.