ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Artificial intelligence in hospital infection prevention: an integrative review.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Physical, Occupational and Neuro-Rehabilitation: Clinical Effectiveness, Prognostic Performance, and Pre-Implementation Feasibility - A Systematic Review.Journal of medical systems · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in mental health care: a scoping review of reviews.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Stakeholder experience with artificial intelligence in healthcare: a bibliometric study of satisfaction, trust, acceptance, and patient engagement.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for infection surveillance, risk stratification, and antimicrobial decision support in acute-care hospitals: a scoping review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in nursing: a systematic review of attitudes, literacy, readiness, and adoption intentions among nursing students and practicing nurses.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Economic, ethical, and regulatory dimensions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: an integrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- AI for Health Care Quality and Patient Safety: Scoping Review of Diagnostic, Predictive, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Bioengineering Approaches for Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Smart Cardiac ICU: Digital Integration, Predictive Analytics, and Perioperative Inflammation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- [A Transformer-based multimodal model for predicting hospital-acquired infections using imaging and clinical laboratory data].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026Article
- Healthcare-associated infections in Italian long-term care facilities: a machine learning analysis of a 12-month cohort.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in infection surveillance: Data integration, applications and future directions.Biomedical journal · 2026Review
- Effectiveness of nursing interventions on preventing the risk of infection in hospitalized adults: a systematic review.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Fast and reliable machine learning-based detection of postoperative intracranial infections in brain tumor patients: a diagnostic study using routine CSF parameters.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- Development and interpretability of an XGBoost model to predict high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Factors affecting hospital-acquired infections in hospitalized patients in iran: a qualitative study.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Comparative Evaluation and Performance of Large Language Models in Clinical Infection Control Scenarios: A Benchmark Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Leveraging artificial intelligence for One Health: opportunities and challenges in tackling antimicrobial resistance - scoping review.One health outlook · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Infectious Diseases in Older Adults: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Applications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) represent a persistent challenge in healthcare, contributing to substantial morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising potential for improving HAIs prevention through advanced predictive capabilities. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness, usability, and challenges of AI models in preventing, detecting, and managing HAIs. Methods: This integrative review synthesized findings from 42 studies, guided by the SPIDER framework for inclusion criteria. We assessed the quality of included studies by applying the TRIPOD checklist to individual predictive studies and the AMSTAR 2 tool for reviews. Results: AI models demonstrated high predictive accuracy for the detection, surveillance, and prevention of multiple HAIs, with models for surgical site infections and urinary tract infections frequently achieving area-under-the-curve (AUC) scores exceeding 0.80, indicating strong reliability. Comparative data suggest that while both machine learning and deep learning approaches perform well, some deep learning models may offer slight advantages in complex data environments. Advanced algorithms, including neural networks, decision trees, and random forests, significantly improved detection rates when integrated with EHRs, enabling real-time surveillance and timely interventions. In resource-constrained settings, non-real-time AI models utilizing historical EHR data showed considerable scalability, facilitating broader implementation in infection surveillance and control. AI-supported surveillance systems outperformed traditional methods in accurately identifying infection rates and enhancing compliance with hand hygiene protocols. Furthermore, Explainable AI (XAI) frameworks and interpretability tools such as Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values increased clinician trust and facilitated actionable insights. AI also played a pivotal role in antimicrobial stewardship by predicting the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms and guiding optimal antibiotic usage, thereby reducing reliance on second-line treatments. However, challenges including the need for comprehensive clinician training, high integration costs, and ensuring compatibility with existing workflows were identified as barriers to widespread adoption. Discussion: The integration of AI in HAI prevention and management represents a potentially transformative shift in enhancing predictive capabilities and supporting effective infection control measures. Successful implementation necessitates standardized validation protocols, transparent data reporting, and the development of user-friendly interfaces to ensure seamless adoption by healthcare professionals. Variability in data sources and model validations across studies underscores the necessity for multicenter collaborations and external validations to ensure consistent performance across diverse healthcare environments. Innovations in non-real-time AI frameworks offer viable solutions for scaling AI applications in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), addressing the higher prevalence of HAIs in these regions. Conclusions: Artificial Intelligence stands as a transformative tool in the fight against hospital-acquired infections, offering advanced solutions for prevention, surveillance, and management. To fully realize its potential, the healthcare sector must prioritize rigorous validation standards, comprehensive data quality reporting, and the incorporation of interpretability tools to build clinician confidence. By adopting scalable AI models and fostering interdisciplinary collaborations, healthcare systems can overcome existing barriers, integrating AI seamlessly into infection control policies and ultimately enhancing patient safety and care quality. Further research is needed to evaluate cost-effectiveness, real-world applications, and strategies (e.g., clinician training and the integration of explainable AI) to improve trust and broaden clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.