ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Immunization strategies against respiratory syncytial virus in Panama: considerations for decision-making in a tropical country-a working group meeting report.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Respiratory syncytial virus prevention in infants and equity in Latin America and the Caribbean: from evidence to action.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
- Genomic Insights Into Respiratory Syncytial Virus Circulation Patterns and Neutralization by Anti-F Monoclonal Antibodies in Panama (2018-2024).Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following the approval of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine and a new monoclonal antibody for passive immunization in children, some Latin American countries have begun using both strategies to prevent RSV-disease. We reviewed these strategies to generate recommendations for their implementation in the Republic of Panama. Experts from different areas and health institutions in Panama gathered in an academic working group to discuss epidemiological data, safety and efficacy aspects, and health economic evaluation elements for both strategies. Aspects of implementing new strategies in Panama were addressed, considering the implementation risks, target population, acceptability, resources, equity, programmatic feasibility, and impact evaluation. According to experts, passive immunization must be universal, including children not exposed to their first RSV season. It could be flexible according to seasonality and must be performed at birth while other vaccines are administered. The immunization must be performed outside the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI). Maternal vaccination targets all children whose mothers are eligible for vaccination and could receive it within the recommended gestational age (32 weeks) as per the World Health Organization and Pan American Health Organization recommendations. A specific RSV surveillance must be implemented in Panama to measure the impact of the strategy implemented. Likewise, an economic evaluation should be performed to define the cost-effectiveness of these strategies. An education campaign and dissemination of the intervention of the population through healthcare professionals is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.