Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241944›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Enhanced predictive accuracy of mortality in VLBW infants with late-onset sepsis through a time-specific nomogram.

Lun Yu, Yanhong Li, Yang Zuming

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lun YuSuzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Yanhong LiChildren's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yang ZumingSuzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram-based scoring system to predict mortality in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with late-onset sepsis (LOS). Timely risk stratification in this vulnerable population is critical for optimizing clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis on 202 VLBW infants diagnosed with LOS between January 2018 and December 2022. Predictive models were created at three key time points: 0 h, 6 h, and 12 h post-sepsis onset, utilizing Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression for variable selection and multivariable logistic regression for model construction. Internal validation was performed with 1,000 bootstrap resamples to correct for potential overfitting. External validation was conducted on an independent cohort of 71 infants from January 2023 to March 2024. Model performance was assessed using Area Under the Curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The models exhibited excellent discrimination with AUCs of 0.83, 0.92, and 0.94 at 0 h, 6 h, and 12 h, respectively, in the development cohort, and 0.95, 0.95, and 0.97 in the validation cohort. Calibration plots showed strong agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. The significant disparity in maternal COVID-19 infection rates between cohorts (1 vs. 89%) may have contributed to the enhanced predictive accuracy in the external cohort. Conclusion: This dynamic, time-specific nomogram demonstrates high predictive accuracy and clinical utility for mortality in VLBW infants with LOS. The impact of maternal COVID-19 infection on neonatal outcomes offers a novel perspective for future research in sepsis prognostication.

Indexed as

Infant, Very Low Birth WeightNeonatal SepsisNomogramsSepsisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsCOVID-19neonatal late-onset sepsisnomogramsprediction modelvery-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants

Identifiers

PMID40241944
PMCPMC11999929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.