Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241934›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025

Effectiveness of electrical stimulation with conservative treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms in Parkinson's disease: A three-armed randomized controlled trial protocol.

Dorien Bennink, Rob A de Bie, Henk W Elzevier, Dagmar H Hepp, Gommert A van Koeveringe, Anton A van der Plas, Hein Putter, Maxime T M Kummeling, Heidi F A Moossdorff-Steinhauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dorien BenninkDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rob A de BieDepartment of Epidemiology, Caphri - Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Henk W ElzevierDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Dagmar H HeppDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Gommert A van KoeveringeDepartment of Urology, Research Institute for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University and Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Anton A van der PlasDepartment of Neurology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, the Netherlands.
Hein PutterDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Maxime T M KummelingDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Heidi F A Moossdorff-SteinhauserDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the high prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD)-ranging from 27 % to 85 % including symptoms such as urinary urgency,- incontinence, frequency, and nocturia-evidence-based treatment options remain limited. Conservative treatments, such as bladder training, pelvic floor muscle exercises (PFME) with biofeedback and electrical stimulation, have been shown safe and effective in the general population, with minimal side effects. However, their efficacy specifically in PD patients remains unclear. Therefore this study aims to evaluate the effect of electrical stimulation with conservative treatment for LUTS in PD patients. Methods and analysis: This randomized controlled trial includes three study arms. All three groups will receive conservative treatment in combination with different electrical stimulation parameters, small- and broad pulse duration and sham electrical stimulation. In total 150 PD patients with self-reported LUTS who are able to attend a pelvic physical therapy practice independently and complete online questionnaires will be enrolled. The primary outcome is the difference in international prostate symptom score (IPSS), with a range of 0-35.A minimal important difference of 4.2 between baseline and 12 weeks of treatment will be statistical significant (p˂0.05). Secondary outcome include questionnaires evaluating bladder dysfunction, burden, and quality of life and will be collected at baseline, 12 weeks and 24 weeks and at one year. Additionally pelvic floor muscle function will be assed at baseline and after 12 weeks.All participants receive eight sessions along with their assigned electrical stimulation treatment and conservative treatment.

Identifiers

PMID40241934
PMCPMC12002755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.