ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Advances in stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: preclinical evidence and emerging therapeutic approaches.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differences in adipose-derived stem cells from rats with various health statuses and their effects in diabetic rats with erectile dysfunction.Asian journal of andrology · 2026Article
- Vardenafil in the multidisciplinary management of erectile dysfunction: a narrative review on multidimensional outcomes and clinical integration.World journal of urology · 2026Review
- Exploring the impact of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on erectile dysfunction through network toxicology and machine learning.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- An updated narrative review on revolutionizing erectile dysfunction treatment: the crucial role of trophic factors in Adipose-Derived stem cell therapy.BMC urology · 2025Review
- Metabolic Syndrome-Associated Erectile Dysfunction: Multiple Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Targets.International journal of biological sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inability to get or sustain an erection strong enough for fulfilling sexual performance is the hallmark of the common disorder known as erectile dysfunction (ED). It mostly affects a significant percentage of men worldwide, particularly those aged 40 to 70. Even though phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDEi) and other conventional therapies have demonstrated efficacy, they frequently prove insufficient for patients with underlying medical disorders such as diabetes, Peyronie's disease, or post-prostatectomy. This review delves into the therapeutic capacity of stem cells for ED, emphasizing the latest clinical and preclinical studies that showcase their efficacy across various models. The review examines diverse sources of stem cells, including adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs), and other emerging sources such as urine-derived stem cells (UDSCs). Critical studies are highlighted, particularly those demonstrating the benefits of MSCs in ED models induced by cavernous nerve injury (CNI), diabetes, and other conditions. The review also explores the role of paracrine signaling, with a focus on factors like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which are involved in the regenerative process. Additionally, the capacity of stem cells with genetic modifications and the integration of stem cell therapy with adjunctive treatments such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and shock wave therapy are discussed. Overall, this review underscores significant progress in both clinical and preclinical studies on cell therapy for ED, paving the way for future clinical applications and innovative treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.