Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241874›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2025

The relationship between proxy decision-making content and cues by families of patients with malignant brain tumor: A descriptive qualitative study.

Runa Tokunaga, Fumiyo Ishikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Runa TokunagaDivision of Nursing, National Defense Medical College (NDMC), Saitama, Japan.
Fumiyo IshikawaFaculty of Human Sciences Department of Nursing, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the content of proxy decision-making made by families of patients with malignant brain tumors regarding treatment policies and daily care and the cues leading to those decisions. Methods: Semi-structured personal interviews were used to collect data. Seven family members of patients with malignant brain tumors were selected to participate in the study by purposive sampling method from June to August 2022 in the Patient Family Association of Japan. Responses were content analyzed to explore the relationship between the content of decisions regarding "treatment policies" and "daily care" and the cues influencing those decisions. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed by using thematic analysis. Results: The contents of proxy decisions regarding "treatment policies" included implementation, interruption, and termination of initial treatments, free medical treatments, use of respirators, and end-of-life sedation and included six cues: treatment policies suggested by the primary physician, information and knowledge about the disease and treatment obtained by the family from limited resources, perceived life threat from symptom worsening, words and reactions from the patient regarding treatment, patient's personality and way of life inferred from their treatment preferences, family's thoughts and values hoping for better treatment for the patient. Decisions for "daily care" included meal content and methods, excretion, mobility, maintaining cleanliness, rehabilitation, continuation or resignation from work, treatment settings (outpatient or inpatient), and ways to spend time outside and included seven cues: words and thoughts from the patient about their way of life, patient's reactions and life history inferred from their preferred way of living, things the patient can do to maintain daily life and roles, awareness of the increasing inability to do things in daily life, family's underlying thoughts and values about how to spend the remaining time, approval from family members regarding the care setting, advice from medical professionals on living at home. Conclusions: For "treatment policies," guidelines from medical professionals were a key cue, while for "daily care," the small signs from the patients in their daily lives served as cues for proxy decision-making. This may be due to the lack of information available to families and the limited time available for discussion with the patient. Families of patients with malignant brain tumors repeatedly use multiple cues to make proxy decision-making under high uncertainty. Therefore, nurses supporting proxy decision-making should assess the family's situation and provide cues that facilitate informed and confident decisions.

Indexed as

Brain neoplasmsCuesFamilyNursesProxy decision-making

Identifiers

PMID40241874
PMCPMC11997684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.