ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2025
Effects of the hospital-community-family trinity cardiac rehabilitation on patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized trial.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and economic impact of a WeChat-based integrated care model for pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a retrospective propensity score matched study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and selection of exercise prescriptions for myocardial infarction patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Effect of exercise rehabilitation training on cardiac function and quality of life after PCI for acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring the experience of community hospital-led home-based cardiac rehabilitation health management in patients with coronary heart disease: a qualitative focus group study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to develop a hospital-community-family trinity cardiac rehabilitation (CR) intervention program and assess its' effects on patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Between April 2022 and April 2023, patients who had experienced AMI after PCI were enrolled. These patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG) in equal numbers. The CG received standard CR, while the IG participated in the advanced trinity CR program in addition to the standard CR. Key parameters measured included the anaerobic threshold (AT), maximum oxygen uptake (V̇O2max), maximum exercise load (MEL), metabolic equivalent (MET), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and quality of life (measured by the SF-36). These were assessed pre-intervention and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-intervention. SPSS.26 was employed for data analysis, with statistical methods such as repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), Chi-square tests, and independent sample Results: A total of 110 patients completed the intervention, 55 in each group. There was no significant difference in the scores of all indicators between the two groups before intervention ( Conclusions: The hospital-community-family trinity CR intervention program developted in this study significantly improved exercise endurance, cardiac function, and quality of life in patients with AMI after PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.