ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2025
Validation of the Russian version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory among nurses in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.
Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Occupational burnout among healthcare workers in Central Asia during the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to validate the Russian version of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (R-CBI) among nurses in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan and explored factors contributing to burnout. Methods: The original Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) was translated into the R-CBI using a rigorous forward-backward method and reviewed by experts. Between July and November 2022, 1,530 nurses were recruited through convenience sampling method from various nursing settings in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan to test the scale's reliability and validity, including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), internal consistency reliability, and concurrent validity. A linear regression analysis was conducted to identify influencing factors of burnout. Results: The content of the R-CBI is consistent with the original CBI, consisting of 19 items with three dimensions. The Cronbach's Conclusions: The R-CBI was proved to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing nurses' burnout in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.