ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2025
Development of a personalized parametric finite element model of the knee: Evaluation of geometric variables affecting osteoarthritis progression.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical impact of severe genu valgum (18°) on the lateral meniscus: a finite element stress analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Stress-guided determination of screw trajectory for C1 lateral mass fixation: A finite element approach.Journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoarthritis is a degenerative condition that impacts synovial joints, particularly the knee joint. Researchers regard Finite Element Analysis as a promising technique for managing knee osteoarthritis. However, these models often depend on input geometry from one or more individuals, feature complex interfaces, and require a significant amount of time, which makes them unsuitable for clinical use and reduces their reliability. Purpose: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the personalized parametric model technique in predicting the knee joint's mechanical response, taking into account anatomical variables that influence osteoarthritis. Methods: A 3D model of the knee was created from CT images of a patient with knee osteoarthritis. Lateral, anterior, and posterior knee radiographs were obtained from twenty-six subjects to customize the geometric parameters of the developed parametric model. The knee geometry was parameterized using Ansys software. The models used six parameters to represent the articular surface of the tibial plateau, its slope, and variables attached to the medial and lateral femoral condyles. Parametric FE models were created individually by applying the ground reaction force diagram to each model. Results: Mean maximum von Mises stress was higher in the OA group than in the control group. Simulations of the patients in the OA group indicated that the mean von Mises stress at the articular surfaces diminished with an increase in tibial plateau tilt. Also, individual geometry-specific models exhibited varying responses, thereby confirming the significance of taking personalized geometry into account. Conclusion: Personalized models can be used to simulate mechanical responses and specifically evaluate the effect of the tibial plateau tilt. This work presented an innovative method for creating individualized finite element models of osteoarthritic knees, which can be used as a practical and effective tool in clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.