Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241852›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2025

Development and Validation of an Algorithm for Segmentation of the Prostate and its Zones from Three-dimensional Transrectal Multiparametric Ultrasound Images.

Daniel L van den Kroonenberg, Florian T Delberghe, Auke Jager, Arnoud W Postema, Harrie P Beerlage, Wim Zwart, Massimo Mischi, Jorg R Oddens

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04605276 (Improving the AI-based Image Analysis Algorithm for 3D Multiparametric Ultrasound for the Detection, Grading and Localization of Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04605276 completednot on this map

Improving the AI-based Image Analysis Algorithm for 3D Multiparametric Ultrasound for the Detection, Grading and Localization of Prostate Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2021 to 2024Enrolled608ConditionsProstate CancerArmsNo intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. BJUI compass · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel L van den KroonenbergDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Florian T DelbergheDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Auke JagerDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arnoud W PostemaDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Harrie P BeerlageDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim ZwartAngiogenesis Analytics, JADS Venture Campus, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Massimo MischiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jorg R OddensDepartment of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: Multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS) is being investigated as an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of prostate cancer (PC). Automated prostate segmentation facilitates workflows, and zonal segmentation can aid in PC diagnosis, accounting for differences in imaging characteristics and tumor incidence. Our aim was to develop a deep learning algorithm that can automatically segment the prostate and its zones on three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and conventional brightness-mode (B-mode) images (NCT04605276). Methods: A total of 259 3D mpUS images were collected from men with suspicion for PC in a prospective multicenter trial to develop a computer-aided diagnosis system for PC. Manual segmentation was performed using a custom tool, and an algorithm was developed using a convolutional neural network based on the U-Net architecture. Key findings and limitations: Cross-validation of the automated segmentation algorithm revealed Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.91) for CEUS and 0.94 (95% CI 0.93-0.94) for B-mode ultrasound for 3D prostate segmentation. Zonal segmentation was less accurate, with DSCs of 0.83 (95% CI 0.82-0.84) for CEUS and 0.86 (95% CI 0.85-0.87) for B-mode ultrasound. There was high agreement for prostate volume between automatic segmentation on CEUS and physician-estimated volumes on MRI (R Conclusions and clinical implications: Our deep learning algorithm demonstrated strong performance for automatic prostate and zonal segmentation from 3D CEUS and B-mode ultrasound images. Patient summary: We developed a computer tool to automatically identify the prostate in three-dimensional ultrasound images. The results show high accuracy and closely match manual assessments by urologists. This tool has potential for use in a computer-aided diagnostic system for prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceB modeContrast-enhanced ultrasoundProstateSegmentationTransrectal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40241852
PMCPMC12002784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.