ArticleBJUI compass2025
Multicentre assessment of transperineal targeted prostate biopsy performed as part of a targeted and systematic biopsy diagnostic strategy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Article in BJUI compass, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are template prostate biopsies still required in patients with high-risk PI-RADS lesions? A retrospective study of 470 patients.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the added value of systematic biopsies in men referred with suspected PCa undergoing visual registration targeted local anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsies (LATPB) as their first biopsy for MRI-P visible lesions (MRI Score≥3) in a real-world setting. Patients and methods: The outcomes of 2611 biopsy naïve men with MRI Score≥3 who underwent visual registration combined targeted and systematic LATPB at 5 hospitals between 2021 and 2024 were studied. The primary outcome was the clinically significant PCa (csPCa [Gleason≥ 3 + 4 = 7])) cancer detection rate at targeted prostate biopsy without upgrading contributed by the systematic component of the biopsies. Results: Overall, PCa was diagnosed in 2079/2611 (80%) patients. The targeted biopsy csPCa detection rate in MRI Score 3,4 and 5 lesions was 108/534 (20%), 461/940 (49%) and 865/1137 (76%), respectively. The csPCa detection rate for combined biopsies in MRI Score 3, 4 and 5 lesions was 150/534 (28%), 579/940 (62%) and 959/1137 (84%). The NPV for targeted biopsies for MRI scores 3,4 and 5 lesions were 81.7%, 95% CI = (78.0%, 84.9%), 68.4%, 95% CI = (63.5%, 73.0%) and 55.7%, 95% CI = (48.0%, 63.1%), respectively. Increasing PSA-D was strongly associated with increased detection of csPCa at targeted prostate biopsy irrespective of MRI score (chi-square test p < 0.001). Conclusions: An MRI-P and targeted prostate biopsy-only approach should be considered in all biopsy naïve men with MRI score 5 lesions and MRI score 4 lesions with a PSA Density greater than 0.15. Patient summary: We looked at the difference between sampling a specific area of interest identified by prostate MRI compared to sampling the area of interest and additionally the prostate zones. In our study, we concluded that sampling the area of interest guided by the MRI scan alone can be more beneficial with less risk of missing out on clinically important prostate cancer in real-life practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.