ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2025
Effect of timing of norepinephrine administration on prognosis of patients with septic shock: A prospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early norepinephrine for patients with septic shock: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Corrigendum to "Effect of timing of norepinephrine administration on prognosis of patients with septic shock: A prospective cohort study" [Journal of Intensive Medicine volume 2 (2025) 160-166].Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Association between time to target mean arterial pressure and 90-day mortality in septic shock: a post hoc analysis of the OPTPRESS trial.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Deriving consensus sepsis clusters via goal-directed subgroup identification in multi-omics study.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis and septic shock are major healthcare problems worldwide, associated with substantial mortality. Early administration of norepinephrine in septic shock patients has been associated with an increased survival rate, but the timing from septic shock to norepinephrine initiation is controversial. This study examined the associations between the timing of initial norepinephrine administration and clinical outcomes in adult patients with septic shock. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted from September 2021 to June 2022 in an intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary general hospital. All enrolled patients were divided into early and late norepinephrine groups according to whether the time from the onset of septic shock to the first application of norepinephrine was >1 h. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, time to achieve a mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≥65 mmHg, 24-hour infusion volume, 6-hour Lac clearance, mechanical ventilation days, and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT )ratio. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent risk factors for 28-day mortality. Results: This study enrolled 120 patients, including 42 patients (35.0%) and 78 patients (65.0%) in the early and late norepinephrine groups, respectively. The 28-day mortality was lower in the early group than in the late group (28.6% Conclusions: Norepinephrine initiation ≤1 h is associated with lower 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock. Early norepinephrine administration is also associated with a shorter time to achieve MAP ≥65 mmHg, lower 24-hour intravenous fluids volume, and higher 6-hour Lac clearance rate. Being male, time to achieve MAP ≥65 mmHg, and norepinephrine initiation >1 h are independent risk factors for 28-day mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.