Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241838›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2025

Is it beneficial to allow the patient's family to attend cardiac resuscitation: Different cultural perspectives? A scoping review.

Hasan Abualruz, Mohammad A Abu Sabra, Elham H Othman, Malakeh Z Malak, Saleh Al Omar, Reema R Safadi, Salah M AbuRuz, Khaled Suleiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hasan AbualruzFaculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Mohammad A Abu SabraSchool of Nursing, The University of Jordan-Aqaba Campus, Aqaba, Jordan.
Elham H OthmanSchool of Nursing, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan.
Malakeh Z MalakFaculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Saleh Al OmarFaculty of Nursing, Al-Balqa Applied University, Salt, Jordan.
Reema R SafadiSchool of Nursing, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Salah M AbuRuzDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Khaled SuleimanFaculty of Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) is a controversial issue that remains unresolved in contemporary practice. Although there are many research studies on FPDR and several published statements and guidelines supporting FPDR by international organizations, no conclusive position guides clinicians in making a decision. A scoping review was conducted to discuss the different healthcare professionals (HCPs) and cultural perspectives toward family presence during CPR is conducted. Methods: Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, we screened 797 studies published between 2000 and 2022 from the databases including Springer Link, MEDLINE, Pro-Quest Central, CINAHL Plus, and Google Scholar. All articles were filtered using inclusion criteria to eliminate redundant, irrelevant, and unnecessary content. Results: A total of 34 studies that fulfill the eligibility criteria reported that there are multiple perspectives from HCPs and families about FPDR. HCPs felt that their performance had improved during resuscitation and received family support in breaking the bad news of death. Family relatives who attended cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) had less stress, less anxiety, more positive grieving behavior, and enhanced family members' decision-making. Contrastingly, some HCPs were against FPDR because they were concerned about the family's misinterpretation of resuscitation activities, psychological trauma to the family members, increased stress levels among staff, and worry about an unexpected response from the distressed family. Conclusions: It is important to consider the culture and awareness of families when deciding on FPDR. It is the responsibility of HCPs to assess family members' willingness and the benefits they attain from attending CPR. The decision should be based on the given situation, cultural context and beliefs, and current policy to guide practice.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary resuscitationCultural perspectivesEnd-of-life careFPDRHealth policyProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID40241838
PMCPMC11997561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.