ReviewJournal of intensive medicine2025
Diagnostic approach in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.
Review in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Awake prone positioning reduces mortality, intubation, and hospital stay in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 6,164 patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) is the leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Of patients with AHRF, 40 %-50 % will require invasive mechanical ventilation during their stay in the ICU, and 30 %-80 % will meet the Berlin Criteria for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Rapid identification of the underlying cause of AHRF is necessary before initiating targeted treatment. Almost 10 % of patients with ARDS have no identified classic risk factors however, and the precise cause of AHRF may not be identified in up to 15 % of patients, particularly in cases of immunosuppression. In these patients, a multidisciplinary, comprehensive, and hierarchical diagnostic work-up is mandatory, including a detailed history and physical examination, chest computed tomography, extensive microbiological investigations, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cytological analysis, immunological tests, and investigation of the possible involvement of pneumotoxic drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.