Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241830›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2025

Parenteral calcium administration and outcomes in critically ill patients with hypocalcemia: A retrospective cohort study.

Max Melchers, Hanneke Pierre Franciscus Xaverius Moonen, Tessa Maria Breeman, Sjoerd Hendrika Willem van Bree, Arthur Raymond Hubert van Zanten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Max MelchersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, 6761 EP, Ede, The Netherlands.
Hanneke Pierre Franciscus Xaverius MoonenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, 6761 EP, Ede, The Netherlands.
Tessa Maria BreemanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, 6761 EP, Ede, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd Hendrika Willem van BreeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, 6761 EP, Ede, The Netherlands.
Arthur Raymond Hubert van ZantenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, 6761 EP, Ede, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypocalcemia is common among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The administration of calcium in critically ill patients with hypocalcemia remains debated, as previous data on outcomes are conflicting, and subgroup analyses are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the association between parenteral calcium administration and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients who had hypocalcemia with and without sepsis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included individuals who developed hypocalcemia during the first 7 days of admission to a mixed medical-surgical adult ICU at a University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients who were not receiving renal replacement therapy, and were admitted to the ICU for at least 48 h between October 1, 2015 and September 24, 2020, were included. The primary outcomes included all-cause 180-day mortality and time-to-shock resolution. Subgroup analyses were conducted in sepsis and nonsepsis patients with mild or moderate hypocalcemia, based on median splits. Proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to identify the association between parenteral calcium administration and outcome parameters. Results: Among the 1100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 427 (38.8 %) patients were admitted for sepsis and 576 (52.4 %) patients received parenteral calcium. Patients who received and did not receive parenteral calcium demonstrated no significant difference in 180-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.18, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 1.56). Intravenous calcium administration reduced the probability of a shorter time to shock resolution (adjusted odds ratio = 0.81, 95 % CI: 0.70 to 0.94). Subgroup analyses in patients with and without sepsis indicated no significant association between calcium administration (aHR = 1.63, 95 % CI: 0.99 to 2.69) and 180-day mortality (aHR = 1.06, 95  % CI: 0.74 to 1.51). Notably, parenteral calcium was associated with an elevated risk of 90- and 180-day mortality in patients who had sepsis and mild hypocalcemia (aHR = 1.88, 95 % CI: 1.02 to 3.47 and aHR = 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.07 to 3.00, respectively). Conclusions: Intravenous calcium administration did not provide survival or shock resolution benefits in ICU patients with hypocalcemia, and may even be harmful. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

CalciumHemodynamicsIntensive careSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID40241830
PMCPMC11997593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.