ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2025
Parenteral calcium administration and outcomes in critically ill patients with hypocalcemia: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol of the Comparison of Two Different Bicarbonate Replacement Fluids during Continuous Veno-Venous Hemofiltration with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.Blood purification · 2025Trial
- Maternal-infant vitamin D coupling and neonatal hypocalcemia: a six-year cohort integrating preterm risk, onset timing, and pandemic effects.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of admission ionized calcium for short-term mortality in critically Ill children with sepsis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Catecholamine-Refractory Shock: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypocalcemia is common among patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). The administration of calcium in critically ill patients with hypocalcemia remains debated, as previous data on outcomes are conflicting, and subgroup analyses are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the association between parenteral calcium administration and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients who had hypocalcemia with and without sepsis. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included individuals who developed hypocalcemia during the first 7 days of admission to a mixed medical-surgical adult ICU at a University-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients who were not receiving renal replacement therapy, and were admitted to the ICU for at least 48 h between October 1, 2015 and September 24, 2020, were included. The primary outcomes included all-cause 180-day mortality and time-to-shock resolution. Subgroup analyses were conducted in sepsis and nonsepsis patients with mild or moderate hypocalcemia, based on median splits. Proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to identify the association between parenteral calcium administration and outcome parameters. Results: Among the 1100 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 427 (38.8 %) patients were admitted for sepsis and 576 (52.4 %) patients received parenteral calcium. Patients who received and did not receive parenteral calcium demonstrated no significant difference in 180-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.18, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.90 to 1.56). Intravenous calcium administration reduced the probability of a shorter time to shock resolution (adjusted odds ratio = 0.81, 95 % CI: 0.70 to 0.94). Subgroup analyses in patients with and without sepsis indicated no significant association between calcium administration (aHR = 1.63, 95 % CI: 0.99 to 2.69) and 180-day mortality (aHR = 1.06, 95 % CI: 0.74 to 1.51). Notably, parenteral calcium was associated with an elevated risk of 90- and 180-day mortality in patients who had sepsis and mild hypocalcemia (aHR = 1.88, 95 % CI: 1.02 to 3.47 and aHR = 1.79, 95 % CI: 1.07 to 3.00, respectively). Conclusions: Intravenous calcium administration did not provide survival or shock resolution benefits in ICU patients with hypocalcemia, and may even be harmful. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.