ArticleJournal of intensive medicine2025
Predicting multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in trauma-induced sepsis: Nomogram and machine learning approaches.
Article in Journal of intensive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathophysiology-guided biomarkers and therapeutics for precision trauma medicine in polytrauma with musculoskeletal injuries.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Construction and validation of a prognostic model for in-hospital multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in ICU patients with respiratory failure based on ultrasound and laboratory parameters.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A Real-Time Dynamic Warning Method for MODS in Trauma Sepsis Patients Based on a Pre-Trained Transfer Learning Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prediction model for risk of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in wasp sting patients: development and validation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is a critical complication in trauma-induced sepsis patients and is associated with a high mortality rate. This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models for MODS in this patient population using a nomogram and machine learning approaches. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV 2.2 database, focusing on trauma patients diagnosed with sepsis within the first day of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Predictive variables were extracted from the initial 24 h of ICU data. The dataset (2008-2019) was divided into a training set (2008-2016) and a temporal validation set (2017-2019). Feature selection was conducted using the Boruta algorithm. Predictive models were developed and validated using a nomogram and various machine learning techniques. Model performance was evaluated based on discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results: Among 1295 trauma patients with sepsis, 349 (26.95%) developed MODS. The 28-day mortality rates were 11.21% for non-MODS patients and 23.82% for MODS patients. Key predictors of MODS included the simplified acute physiology score II score, use of mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor administration. In temporal validation, all models significantly outperformed traditional scoring systems (all Conclusion: The nomogram and machine learning models provide enhanced predictive accuracy for MODS in trauma-induced sepsis patients compared to traditional scoring systems. These tools, accessible via web-based applications, have the potential to improve early risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making, ultimately enhancing outcomes for trauma patients. Further external validation is recommended to confirm their generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.