Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241817›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2025

The Relationship Between Psychosocial Factors and Response to Epidural Steroid Injection for Chronic Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Prospective Pilot Study.

Meredith Stensland, Elizabeth Sanford, Timothy T Houle, Cindy McGeary, Briana A Cobos, Selena Lugosi, Luke Lehman, Paul S Nabity, Caleigh Covell, Elizabeth Fitzgerald and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Meredith StenslandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5829-5580
Elizabeth SanfordDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Timothy T HouleDepartment of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Cindy McGearyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Briana A CobosDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Selena LugosiSchool of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Luke LehmanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Paul S NabityDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Caleigh CovellDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Elizabeth FitzgeraldDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Mahsa MojallalDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8176-8964
David E ReedDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sanjog PangarkarDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Blessen C EapenDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Udai NandaDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Zachary L McCormickDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Donald McGearyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic lumbosacral radicular pain is a disabling condition commonly treated with epidural steroid injections (ESIs). Extant research suggests that psychosocial factors impact clinical outcomes among patients with back pain. The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between psychosocial variables and post-injection pain intensity. Setting: Interventional pain management clinic. Methods: A prospective longitudinal cohort study with repeated within-subject measures. Assessment timepoints included a pre-injection baseline, immediately post-injection, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, and 6 months; patients completed a battery of self-report assessments at each point. The primary outcome was pain intensity (numeric rating scale 0-10). Data were analyzed using principal component analysis and generalized linear mixed-effects modeling. Results: A total of 40 patients (age 52 ±13.05) participated in this study. Higher pre-injection pain was predictive of higher post-injection pain at all time points ( Conclusion: Patients with higher negative affect and lower cognitive resilience achieve less pain improvement after ESIs for low back pain. Future research with a larger sample should focus on deepening our understanding of the role of psychosocial functioning as a potential mechanism of treatment response in patients undergoing ESI procedures. Findings point to the importance of multidisciplinary chronic pain care.

Indexed as

chronic low back painepidural steroid injectionpsychosocialradiculopathy

Identifiers

PMID40241817
PMCPMC12000912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.