ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025
Toward brain-computer interface speller with movement-related cortical potentials as control signals.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain Computer Interface spellers offer a promising alternative for individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) by facilitating communication without relying on muscle activity. This study assessed the feasibility of using movement related cortical potentials (MRCPs) as a control signal for a Brain-Computer Interface speller in an offline setting. Unlike motor imagery-based BCIs, this study focused on executed movements. Fifteen healthy subjects performed three spelling tasks that involved choosing specific letters displayed on a computer screen by performing a ballistic dorsiflexion of the dominant foot. Electroencephalographic signals were recorded from 10 sites centered around Cz. Three conditions were tested to evaluate MRCP performance under varying task demands: a control condition using repeated selections of the letter "O" to isolate movement-related brain activity; a phrase spelling condition with structured text ("HELLO IM FINE") to simulate a meaningful spelling task with moderate cognitive load; and a random condition using a randomized sequence of letters to introduce higher task complexity by removing linguistic or semantic context. The success rate, defined as the presence of an MRCP, was manually determined. It was approximately 69% for both the control and phrase conditions, with a slight decrease in the random condition, likely due to increased task complexity. Significant differences in MRCP features were observed between conditions with Laplacian filtering, whereas no significant differences were found in single-site Cz recordings. These results contribute to the development of MRCP-based BCI spellers by demonstrating their feasibility in a spelling task. However, further research is required to implement and validate real-time applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.