ArticleiScience2025
Real-world effectiveness of novel hormonal agents and docetaxel in patients with prostate cancer: A head-to-head comparison.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation hormonal-targeted therapies for advanced prostate cancer are widely used. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and health resource utilization (HRU) of novel hormonal agents (NHAs) compared to chemotherapy in a real-world context. After propensity score matching, survival analysis revealed no significant difference in overall survival between the individuals treated with NHAs and those treated with docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.11) in the cohort of 1,056 patients. Similar results were observed for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.91-1.14) and PSA response rate (72% [95% CI: 68-76%] for NHAs vs. 76% [95% CI: 72-80%] for docetaxel,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.