Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241766›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

A primate grammar enabling incremental processing.

Quentin Gallot, Yves Tillé, Cassandre Depriester, Steven Moran, Klaus Zuberbühler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Utterance evolution: the road to generative, combinatorial communicators.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Quentin GallotInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Yves TilléInstitute of Statistics, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Cassandre DepriesterInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Steven MoranInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Klaus ZuberbühlerInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterizing the structure and function of animal communication systems provides insights into the cognitive and evolutionary processes shaping signal complexity. One key question is whether and how call sequences allow potential listeners to make predictions about the call-eliciting referents. Here, we investigated whether primate call sequences contained properties that enabled such predictive processing. We analyzed several years of experimentally elicited alarm responses from a West African forest primate, wild olive colobus monkeys. Using Kullback-Leibler divergence and prediction gain approaches, we identified a simple primate grammar that allowed predictions of referents from only minimal input. In particular, sequence-initial positions reliably discriminated urgent from non-urgent threats while the following positions increased the referential specificity regarding two main predators (eagles and leopards) and non-predatory disturbances (falling tree parts). Sequences often contained further calls, which may allow callers to either confirm the referent or to alter the conveyed information. We concluded that animal communication can contain features adapted for predictive, incremental processing, suggesting evolutionary roots older than language.

Indexed as

Biological SciencesEvolutionary biologyZoology

Identifiers

PMID40241766
PMCPMC12003008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.