ArticleiScience2025
A primate grammar enabling incremental processing.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utterance evolution: the road to generative, combinatorial communicators.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterizing the structure and function of animal communication systems provides insights into the cognitive and evolutionary processes shaping signal complexity. One key question is whether and how call sequences allow potential listeners to make predictions about the call-eliciting referents. Here, we investigated whether primate call sequences contained properties that enabled such predictive processing. We analyzed several years of experimentally elicited alarm responses from a West African forest primate, wild olive colobus monkeys. Using Kullback-Leibler divergence and prediction gain approaches, we identified a simple primate grammar that allowed predictions of referents from only minimal input. In particular, sequence-initial positions reliably discriminated urgent from non-urgent threats while the following positions increased the referential specificity regarding two main predators (eagles and leopards) and non-predatory disturbances (falling tree parts). Sequences often contained further calls, which may allow callers to either confirm the referent or to alter the conveyed information. We concluded that animal communication can contain features adapted for predictive, incremental processing, suggesting evolutionary roots older than language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.