ArticleiScience2025
Combining lineage correlations and a small molecule inhibitor to detect circadian control of the cell cycle.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronotherapy offers an exciting possibility for improving cancer treatments by leveraging the influence of the circadian clock on the cell cycle. While several molecular interactions coupling the two oscillators have been identified, whether they lead to emergent control of cellular proliferation remains unclear. Using stochastic simulations, we demonstrate that the established gene networks underlying the two oscillators are sufficient to generate lineage correlations in cell cycle times, as observed in single-cell microscopy data. The interactions also create a 'therapeutic window' between cancer and normal cell proliferation peaks that can be leveraged for chronotherapy. Surprisingly, our model predicts that KL001, a clock inhibitor, minimally affects population growth but significantly alters lineage correlations. Our results suggest that clock control of the cell cycle may not be detectable by measuring changes in population dynamics, but combining measurements of lineage correlations with KL001 treatment may provide a more sensitive approach to detecting the coupling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.