Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241722›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025

The relation between delayed reperfusion treatment and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a national prospective cohort study.

Bård Uleberg, Kaare Harald Bønaa, Kari Krizak Halle, Bjarne K Jacobsen, Beate Hauglann, Eva Stensland, Olav Helge Førde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bård UlebergDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Postboks 6050 Stakkevollan, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-3091
Kaare Harald BønaaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Postboks 8905, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6675-3724
Kari Krizak HalleDepartment of Medical Quality Registers, St. Olavs University Hospital, Postboks 3250, Torgarden, 7006 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1668-9167
Bjarne K JacobsenDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Postboks 6050 Stakkevollan, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0781-3349
Beate HauglannCentre for Clinical Documentation and Evaluation (SKDE), Northern Norway Regional Health Authority, Postboks 6400, 9294 Tromsø, Norway.
Eva StenslandDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Postboks 6050 Stakkevollan, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Olav Helge FørdeDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Postboks 6050 Stakkevollan, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4180-2590

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this nationwide study of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was to investigate the relation between delayed reperfusion and mildly to moderately reduced and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods and results: In this national population-based cohort study, log-binominal and modified Poisson regression models were applied to examine the associations between delayed reperfusion (i.e. fibrinolysis > 30 min or primary percutaneous coronary intervention > 120 min after first medical contact) and reduced LVEF, adjusted for reperfusion strategy, and patient characteristics. A total of 6567 Norwegian patients with STEMI registered in the Norwegian Registry of Myocardial Infarction during 2015-2018 were included in the analyses. Among them, 57% had normal LVEF (≥50%), 39% had mildly to moderately reduced LVEF (31-49%), and 4% had severely reduced LVEF (≤30%), measured during the acute admission. The adjusted relative risk of having a mildly to moderately reduced LVEF was 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.18] for patients receiving delayed vs. timely reperfusion, and the adjusted relative risk of having severely reduced LVEF was 1.76 (95% CI 1.37-2.25) for patients receiving delayed vs. timely reperfusion. Reperfusion strategy, either primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or a pharmacoinvasive strategy (PI), was not a significant determinant for reduced LVEF in any of the analyses. Conclusion: Delayed reperfusion treatment in STEMI increases the risk of mildly to moderately reduced LVEF, and the risk of severely reduced LVEF substantially, compared with timely reperfusion. The risk of reduced LVEF did not differ between patients treated with pPCI or PI.

Indexed as

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI)FibrinolysisPCI

Identifiers

PMID40241722
PMCPMC12001758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.