ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025
The relation between delayed reperfusion treatment and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a national prospective cohort study.
Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics analysis of early reperfused ischemic heart reveals ERRβ/γ activation protects against acute myocardial infarction injury.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Article
- The Irreversible March of Time: Ischemic Delay and Impact on Outcomes in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Reducing STEMI Treatment Delays: A Quality Improvement Project at a Rural Community Hospital.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this nationwide study of patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was to investigate the relation between delayed reperfusion and mildly to moderately reduced and severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods and results: In this national population-based cohort study, log-binominal and modified Poisson regression models were applied to examine the associations between delayed reperfusion (i.e. fibrinolysis > 30 min or primary percutaneous coronary intervention > 120 min after first medical contact) and reduced LVEF, adjusted for reperfusion strategy, and patient characteristics. A total of 6567 Norwegian patients with STEMI registered in the Norwegian Registry of Myocardial Infarction during 2015-2018 were included in the analyses. Among them, 57% had normal LVEF (≥50%), 39% had mildly to moderately reduced LVEF (31-49%), and 4% had severely reduced LVEF (≤30%), measured during the acute admission. The adjusted relative risk of having a mildly to moderately reduced LVEF was 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.18] for patients receiving delayed vs. timely reperfusion, and the adjusted relative risk of having severely reduced LVEF was 1.76 (95% CI 1.37-2.25) for patients receiving delayed vs. timely reperfusion. Reperfusion strategy, either primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) or a pharmacoinvasive strategy (PI), was not a significant determinant for reduced LVEF in any of the analyses. Conclusion: Delayed reperfusion treatment in STEMI increases the risk of mildly to moderately reduced LVEF, and the risk of severely reduced LVEF substantially, compared with timely reperfusion. The risk of reduced LVEF did not differ between patients treated with pPCI or PI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.