Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241703›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2025

Comparative study of volatile and non-volatile flavor substances in squid from multiple origins.

Mengli Han, Xin Jiang, Meijiao Gui, Qianqian Liang, Yuan Gu, Xin Song, Wenzheng Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mengli HanCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Xin JiangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Meijiao GuiCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Qianqian LiangCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Yuan GuDandong Yuanyi Seafood Finishing Products Co. Ltd, Dandong 118300, Liaoning, China.
Xin SongDandong Yuanyi Seafood Finishing Products Co. Ltd, Dandong 118300, Liaoning, China.
Wenzheng ShiCollege of Food Science and Technology, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared and analyzed the similarities and differences in odor and taste between Japanese flying squid and Equatorial, Indian Ocean, and Peruvian squid. Headspace gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) and headspace solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS), respectively, identified 52 and 43 volatile compounds, with aldehydes and alcohols being the main volatile substances. Cluster analyses showed that Equatorial squid were closest in odor to Japanese flying squid. A total of 16 free amino acids, 6 flavor nucleotides and 3 organic acids were identified from the four squid species by HPLC. There was no significant difference between Japanese flying squid and Peruvian squid in umami intensity. Hierarchical cluster analysis classified the flavors of the four squids into three categories, that was Equatorial squid and Japanese flying squid, Indian Ocean squid, Peruvian squid, which will provide a reference for raw material substitution of Japanese flying squid.

Indexed as

Different originsFlavorSquidTasteVolatile compounds

Identifiers

PMID40241703
PMCPMC12002968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.