Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241700›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2025

Comparison of phenotypic and phytochemical profiles of 20

Ting Huang, Ning Jia, Lunxuan Zhu, Wen Jiang, Aobai Tu, Ken Qin, Xiaojin Yuan, Juxiu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bioactive spectrum of goji berries (Food chemistry: X · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ting HuangCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Ning JiaCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Lunxuan ZhuCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Wen JiangCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Aobai TuCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Ken QinNational Wolfberry Engineering Technology Research Center, Institute of Chinese Wolfberry Science of Ningxia Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
Xiaojin YuanCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.
Juxiu LiCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The variety and drying stage of goji berries (GBs) may affect their final physical and chemical properties. This study investigated the differences in physical phenotypic parameters and major chemical composition parameters of 20 GBs varieties during four stages of hot air-drying (HD). The results indicated that the color difference values L*, a*, and b* decreased during the HD process. The contents of all amino acids decreased, with significant reductions in amino acids involved in the Maillard reaction. Correspondingly, the level of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, a Maillard chemical reaction intermediates, increased. Furthermore, the decreased L* values were closely linked to the decomposition of carotenoids. Notably, the differences in constituents among different varieties of dried GBs were smaller than those in fresh GBs. These findings provide a theoretical basis for optimization of the GBs drying process, contributing to the expansion of GBs breeding programs and their use in global functional food and pharmaceutical industries.

Indexed as

Drying stageFruit qualityGoji berryHot-air dryingVarieties

Identifiers

PMID40241700
PMCPMC12001131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.