ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2025
Preferences of healthcare workers for security personnel to prevent occupational violence: A discrete choice experiment.
Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundOccupational violence against healthcare workers is increasing worldwide. The role of security personnel in healthcare settings is critical, yet little is known about the attributes of security personnel that are most important to healthcare workers.ObjectiveThis study seeks to identify the preferred attributes of security personnel from the healthcare professional's perspective.MethodsAn online survey was administered to a representative sample of healthcare staff including health service managers, clinicians, and nurses at Metro North Hospital and Health Service in Queensland, Australia. We employed a convenience sampling method where the survey link was emailed to 780 healthcare staff members, and 179 participants responded. Using the Discrete Choice Experiment methodology, this study quantified individuals' preferences. It explored several attributes of security personnel, including skills, uniform presence, coverage location, availability, level of professional development, and whether the security personnel are integrated within the clinical team.ResultsHealthcare workers showed a strong preference for security personnel possessing interpersonal skills. They favoured personnel located within specific wards or units, available round-the-clock (24/7), and being embedded within the clinical team. Further, they strongly preferred personnel who have undergone extended training in professional development. Interestingly, the presence or absence of a security uniform did not have an impact on their preferences.ConclusionThe results of this study offer insights into the optimal attributes of security personnel from a healthcare workers' perspective. Future violence prevention strategies can be designed taking into consideration these preferred attributes of security personnel, thus increasing the likelihood of their acceptance and success among healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.