Observational studyScience progress
Role of InterLeukin-6 monitoring during weaning from volume-controlled ventilation in patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Observational study in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circulating and Respiratory Biomarkers in Sepsis-Induced ARDS: Diagnostic and Prognostic Insights - A Narrative Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the ability of plasma InterLeukin-6 (IL-6) monitoring to predict the failure to switch from volume-controlled ventilation to spontaneous ventilation (SV) in patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).MethodsWe conducted an observational, single-center and prospective cohort study in the medico-surgical intensive care unit of Avignon Hospital Center. Participants were adult patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for COVID-19-related ARDS between August 2021 and August 2022, who were eligible for switching from volume-controlled ventilation to SV.ResultsAmong the 35 patients included in the study, 13 (37%) successfully switched from controlled ventilation to SV, while 22 failed (63%). In the failure group, mean plasma IL-6 levels were higher than in the successful group from hour 0 (defined as the moment of the switch to SV mode) to 48 h. However, differences between groups became significant from 24 h (362.8 vs. 33.6 pg/mL, P = 0.002). Interestingly, between-group differences in plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were only significant between groups from 48 h (129.3 vs. 52.2 mg/L, P = 0.017). Finally, IL-6 and CRP had a similar ability to predict the failure to switch to SV mode: area under the receiving operative curves 0.763 [95%CI: 0.633-0.893] and 0.753 [95%CI: 0.595-0.911], respectively (P = 0.87).ConclusionsIL-6 and CRP are inflammatory biomarkers predictive of failure to switch to SV mode in COVID-19 ARDS patients. Our results showed that IL-6 can detect failure earlier than CRP. However, larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm our results, particularly in other ARDS models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.