ArticleAnimal bioscience2025
Rapid determination of nutrient composition and mineral element content of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) using near-infrared spectroscopy.
Article in Animal bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to establish an accurate and reliable near-infrared spectroscopy to enable rapid, efficient, and non-destructive evaluation of the nutritional quality of common vetches across different regions and varieties.
methodsA total of 190 samples from various regions and varieties were selected for this study, which were divided into a calibration set (4:1 ratio) and validation set. The original spectrum of the calibration set is subjected to 10 different pretreatment techniques in combination with first and second derivatives, while the prediction model was established by combining the measured value of common vetch with the modified partial least squares method.
resultsThe results indicate that the calibration root-mean-square error and cross-validation root-mean-square error values range from 0.01 to 1.25 and 0.01 to 1.37, respectively. The determination coefficients of cross-validation (R2 CV) for phosphorus (P), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), and iron (Fe) are relatively low at 0.82, 0.86, 0.82, and 0.74, respectively; however, all other indicators have R2 CV values above 0.90. The predicted root means square errors (RMSEP) for common vetch indexes range from 0.01 to 1.87, with RMSEP values higher than 1.0 observed for crude protein, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, and ash indices, whereas RMSEP values lower than or equal to 1.0 were obtained for other indicators. The measured coefficient of determination (R2p) demonstrates that the R2p values for each nutrient element and mineral element vary from 0.70 to 0.96. The residual prediction deviation (RPD) values for Mg exhibit relatively low levels, while the RPD values for other indicators exceed 2.0.
conclusionThese findings suggest that this study provides a viable approach to evaluate the nutritional composition and mineral element content of different varieties and regions of common vetch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.