Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241520›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment

Enhancing Specificity in Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer through an Interpretable Machine Learning Model with CEM and Ultrasound Integration.

Weimin Xu, Bowen Zheng, Chanjuan Wen, Hui Zeng, Sina Wang, Zilong He, Xin Liao, Weiguo Chen, Yingjia Li, Genggeng Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Weimin XuDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bowen ZhengDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8653-8060
Chanjuan WenDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hui ZengDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sina WangDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2159-7921
Zilong HeDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xin LiaoDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weiguo ChenDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yingjia LiDepartment of Ultrasonic Medicine, NanfangHospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Genggeng QinDepartment of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7563-3924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionThe study aims to evaluate the performance of an interpretable machine learning model in predicting preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis using primary breast cancer and lymph node features derived from contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and ultrasound (US) breast imaging reporting and data systems (BI-RADS).MethodsThis retrospective study included patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer. Two experienced radiologists extracted the BI-RADS features from the largest cross-section of the lesions and axillary lymph nodes based on CEM and US images, creating three datasets. Each dataset will train six base models to predict axillary lymph nodes, with pathological results serving as the gold standard. The top three models were used to train the five ensemble models. Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the optimal model. The receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC) and AUC were used to evaluate model performance.ResultsThis study involved 292 female patients, of whom 99 had axillary lymph node metastasis and 193 did not. The combination of CEM and ultrasound BI-RADS demonstrated the best performance in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis. Among these, the LightGBM achieved the highest AUC (0.762) and specificity (86.67%, while the ensemble model using RF as the meta-model had an AUC (0.754) and specificity (83.33%. The most important variables identified by SHAP were the long diameters of the lymph nodes in the CEM recombined image, along with their complete morphology in the low-energy image.ConclusionThe machine learning model using CEM and US BI-RADS features accurately predicted axillary lymph node metastasis before surgery, thereby serving as a valuable tool for clinical decision-making in patients with breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMachine LearningMammographyUltrasonography, MammaryAdultAgedAxillaContrast MediaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveUltrasonographyContrast Mediaaxillary lymph node metastasisbreast cancerCEMmachine learningultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40241520
PMCPMC12035205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.