ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
The influence of changing fire regimes on specialized plant-animal interactions.
Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disturbance Mosaics Shape Multiple Pollinator Taxa Across Spatial and Temporal Scales in Fire-Managed Forests.Global change biology · 2026Article
- Rainfall immediately before and after fire promotes long-term occurrence of a rare, fire-sensitive passerine.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
- The Mechanisms Through Which Fire Drives Population Change in Terrestrial Biota.Global change biology · 2025Review
- Article
- The influence of changing fire regimes on specialized plant-animal interactions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Novel wildfire regimes under climate change and human activity: patterns, driving mechanisms and ecological impacts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecological effects of changing fire regimes are well documented for plant and animal populations, but less is known about how fire influences, and is influenced by, specialized plant-animal interactions. In this review, we identified mutualistic (pollination, seed dispersal and food provision), commensal (habitat provision) and antagonistic (seed predation, herbivory and parasitism) plant-animal interactions from fire-prone ecosystems. We focused on specialized interactions where a single genus depended on one to two genera in a single family of plant or animal. We categorized the plant partner's post-fire reproductive mode to assess the likely outcome of changing fire regimes on ecological functions provided by these interactions. Traits underlying specialization in fire-prone ecosystems for plants were: post-fire reproductive mode, time to maturity, morphology and phenology; and, for animals: dispersal, specialized organs, nesting and egg deposition substrates, plant consumption behaviours and pollinator behaviours. Finally, we identified a number of cases where stabilizing feedbacks maintained plant-animal interactions under natural fire regimes. Potential reinforcing feedbacks were also identified, but were more likely to happen abruptly and result in collapse of the plant-animal partnership, or partner switching. Our synthesis reveals how fire regime changes impact fire-dependent specialist plant-animal interactions and potentially drive eco-evolutionary dynamics in fire-prone ecosystems globally.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.