Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241450›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Climate, vegetation, people: disentangling the controls of fire at different timescales.

Sandy P Harrison, Olivia Haas, Patrick J Bartlein, Luke Sweeney, Guoxi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Novel wildfire regimes under climate change and human activity: patterns, driving mechanisms and ecological impacts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sandy P HarrisonLeverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BW, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5687-1903
Olivia HaasLeverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3957-7707
Patrick J BartleinDepartment of Geography, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7657-5685
Luke SweeneyLeverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8161-819X
Guoxi ZhangGeography and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9063-3287

Funding

Eric and Wendy Schmidt Fund for Strategic Innovation (Schmidt Futures)Leverhulme Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activities have a major impact on fire regimes. Human activities that cause landscape fragmentation, such as creating roads and other infrastructure or converting areas to agriculture, tend to restrict, rather than promote, fire. The human influence is complex, however, and the impact of fragmentation on the fire regime depends on climate and vegetation conditions. Climate-induced changes in vegetation and fuel loads also affect the natural fire regime in ways independent of human influence. Disentangling the controls of fire regimes is challenging because of the multiple interactions between climate, vegetation, people and fire, and the different timescales over which they operate. We explore these relationships, drawing on statistical and modelling analyses of palaeoenvironmental, historical and recent observations at regional to global scales. We show how these relationships have changed through time and how they vary spatially as a function of environmental and biotic gradients. Specifically, we show that climate and climate-driven changes in vegetation have been the most important drivers of changing fire regimes at least until the Industrial Revolution. Statistical and modelling analyses show no discernible impact of hunter-gatherer communities, and even the time-transgressive introduction of agriculture during the Neolithic had no impact on fire regimes at a regional scale. The post-industrial expansion of agriculture was an important influence on fires, but since the late 19th century, the overwhelming influence of humans has been to reduce fire through progressive landscape fragmentation rather than through influencing ignitions. Model projections suggest that the reduction of fire through fragmentation will be outweighed by climatically driven increases by the end of the 21st century.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.

Indexed as

ClimateClimate ChangeEcosystemFiresHuman ActivitiesHumansfire ecologyfire modellingfire propertiesfuture fire regimeshuman influence on firepalaeofires

Identifiers

PMID40241450
PMCPMC12004104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.