Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241447›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025

Priority research directions for wildfire science: views from a historically fire-prone and an emerging fire-prone country.

Kerryn Little, Rayanne Vitali, Claire M Belcher, Nicholas Kettridge, Adam F A Pellegrini, Adriana E S Ford, Alistair M S Smith, Andy Elliott, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Cathelijne R Stoof and 22 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Novel wildfire regimes under climate change and human activity: patterns, driving mechanisms and ecological impacts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

Kerryn LittleSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8303-5297
Rayanne VitaliWildFIRE Lab, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3712-0834
Claire M BelcherWildFIRE Lab, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Nicholas KettridgeSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Adam F A PellegriniUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Adriana E S FordLeverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alistair M S SmithDepartment of Earth and Spatial Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0071-9958
Andy ElliottWildFIRE Lab, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Apostolos VoulgarakisLeverhulme Centre for Wildfires, Environment and Society, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Cathelijne R StoofSoil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0198-9215
Crystal A KoldenUniversity of California Merced School of Engineering, Merced, CA, USA.
Dylan W SchwilkTexas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Eric B KennedySchool of Administrative Studies, York University, North York, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0056-1521
Fiona E Newman ThackerSoil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Gail R Millin-ChalabiDepartment of Geography, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Gareth D ClayDepartment of Geography, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
James I MorisonForest Research UK, Farnham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0803-637X
Jessica L McCartyNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA.
Katy IvisonSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Kevin TanseySchool of Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Kimberley J SimpsonAnimal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6673-227X
Matthew W JonesSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Michelle C MackCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society, Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Peter Z FuléSchool of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
Rob GazzardForestry Commission England, Brandon, UK.
Sandy P HarrisonGeography and Environmental Science, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5687-1903
Stacey NewMet Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7992-2179
Susan E PageSchool of Geography, Geology and the Environment, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Tilly E HallDepartment of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2502-2682
Tim BrownDesert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada, UK.
W Matt JollyRocky Mountain Research Station Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT, USA.
Stefan DoerrDepartment of Geography, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation CouncilNatural Environment Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fire regimes are changing across the globe, with new wildfire behaviour phenomena and increasing impacts felt, especially in ecosystems without clear adaptations to wildfire. These trends pose significant challenges to the scientific community in understanding and communicating these changes and their implications, particularly where we lack underlying scientific evidence to inform decision-making. Here, we present a perspective on priority directions for wildfire science research-through the lens of academic and government wildfire scientists from a historically wildfire-prone (USA) and emerging wildfire-prone (UK) country. Key topic areas outlined during a series of workshops in 2023 were as follows: (A) understanding and predicting fire occurrence, fire behaviour and fire impacts; (B) increasing human and ecosystem resilience to fire; and (C) understanding the atmospheric and climate impacts of fire. Participants agreed on focused research questions that were seen as priority scientific research gaps. Fire behaviour was identified as a central connecting theme that would allow critical advances to be made across all topic areas. These findings provide one group of perspectives to feed into a more transdisciplinary outline of wildfire research priorities across the diversity of knowledge bases and perspectives that are critical in addressing wildfire research challenges under changing fire regimes.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.

Indexed as

EcosystemFiresResearchWildfiresClimate ChangeHumansUnited KingdomUnited Statesfire behaviourfire ecologyfire regimesglobal changeresearch gapswildfire

Identifiers

PMID40241447
PMCPMC12004099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.