ReviewPhysiologia plantarum
Nanoparticles as tools for enhancing plant resistance to biotic stress in the context of climate change.
Review in Physiologia plantarum. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Genome Editing Approaches in Flax (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Basic Substances and Nanotechnology: Bridging Sustainability and Innovation for Fungal Disease Management in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nano-Enabled Solutions for Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Soil Contaminant Remediation: A Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Biogenic gold nanoparticles conjugated with rhizobacteria enhance tomato growth and suppress pathogen infection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Harnessing synergistic potential of plant growth promoting bacteria to mitigate climate-induced stress in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Bridging the gap: integrating plant physiology and soil science in nanotechnology and biochar research for sustainable agriculture.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Nanoparticles as Innovative Tools for Enhancing Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Supporting Integrated Disease Management in Oil Crops.Physiologia plantarumReview
- Nanoparticles as tools for enhancing plant resistance to biotic stress in the context of climate change.Physiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the face of climate change, agriculture is increasingly challenged by shifting dynamics of biotic stresses, including the intensified spread of pests and pathogens. Traditional control methods, often reliant on chemical pesticides, are associated with environmental degradation and potential health risks. Nanoparticles (NPs) present a promising, sustainable alternative for enhancing plant resistance to biotic stresses, potentially revolutionizing agricultural practices. This mini-review explores the mechanisms through which NP-based formulations (such as metal-based NPs, chitosan, and silica) induce plant responses and bolster defences against pathogens and pests. By enhancing plant resilience without the environmental downsides of conventional pesticides, NPs could support a more sustainable approach to crop protection. This review also highlights the potential risks in expanding the use of NPs in agriculture, urging more studies to explore these technologies as a sustainable approach to managing crops in a changing climate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.