ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2025
Regional disparities and sociodemographic determinants of intention to use contraceptives among Somali women: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2020 SDHS.
Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transitions between contraceptive states among women aged 15-49 Years in Guinea.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Prevalence and factors associated with modern and dual contraceptive use among women living with HIV in Cross River State, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2026Article
- Modern contraceptive use in Somalia: a multivariable analysis of prevalence and predictors among women of reproductive age.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Barriers and Disparities in Maternal and Child Vaccination Coverage in Galmudug State, Somalia: A Descriptive Study.Sage open pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContraceptive use is vital to improve maternal and child health, promote economic stability, and empower women. Despite global progress in family planning, Somalia faces unique challenges due to cultural, economic, and infrastructural barriers, resulting in low contraceptive use. This study investigated the prevalence and determinants of the intention to use contraceptives among women of reproductive age in Somali.
methodsUsing data from the 2020 Somali Demographic and Health Survey (SDHS), this study analyzed a sample of 7,967 women aged 15-49. Contraceptive intention was categorized as "intent to use" versus "no intent to use." The SDHS questionnaire assesses intention to use contraceptives in the next 12 months, which aligns with standard DHS definitions. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the association between contraceptive intention and sociodemographic factors. Choropleth maps and bar charts illustrate regional disparities.
resultsOverall, only 7.6% of the women intended to use contraception, with substantial regional variation. Woqooyi Galbeed reported the highest prevalence of contraceptive intention at 18.4%, while Gedo had the lowest at 1.1%. Significant predictors of contraceptive intention included higher education (AOR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.21-4.56), secondary education (AOR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.12-3.26). Women residing in nomadic communities had significantly lower odds of intending to use contraception (AOR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.23-0.68). Since nomadic residence often implies reduced healthcare access, this finding suggests logistical and cultural barriers to contraceptive intentions. Cultural and geographic factors significantly influence contraceptive intentions.
conclusionRegional, educational, and socioeconomic variations affect contraceptive intentions in Somalia. Addressing these disparities through targeted educational and healthcare access interventions could improve family planning and utilization, ultimately enhancing maternal and child health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.