Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241217›Full record

ArticleBMC chemistry2025

Removal of Brilliant Blue R and Victoria Blue R dyes from textile wastewater by adsorption method using pomegranate peel.

Bediha Akmese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bediha AkmeseVocational School of Health Services, Department of Pharmacy Services, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey. bedihaakmese@hitit.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6652-4574

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the removal of Brilliant Blue R (BBR) and Victoria Blue R (VBR), commonly used dyes in the textile industry, from wastewater using the pomegranate peel with an adsorption method. Pomegranate peel was characterized by using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Brunauer, Emmet ve Teller (BET), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FT-IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and zeta potential. For both dyes, pH, adsorbent amount, contact time, salt effect, and wastewater parameters were investigated in the batch system, while adsorbent amount and flow rate parameters were investigated in the continuous system. The adsorption results of both dyes on pomegranate peel indicate that they fit the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The adsorption isotherms of both dyes were found to be compatible with the Langmuir isotherm model. In the thermodynamic study, it was determined that the adsorption process was spontaneous (∆G°<0) and exothermic (∆H°<0). It was decided that pomegranate peel is a suitable adsorbent for the adsorption of BBR and VBR dyes. Finally, the adsorption yields for removing BBR and VBR from wastewater using pomegranate peel were 90.38% and 100%, respectively. This result shows that the high adsorption efficiency obtained for both dyes makes it possible for pomegranate peel to be widely applied as an adsorbent in wastewater treatment.

Indexed as

AdsorptionBrilliant Blue RPomegranate peelVictoria Blue RWastewater

Identifiers

PMID40241217
PMCPMC12004687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.