ReviewEye and vision (London, England)2025
Sturge-Weber syndrome secondary glaucoma: From Pathogenesis to Treatment.
Review in Eye and vision (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Somatic Driver to Molecular Therapy in Retinal, Choroidal and Periocular Vascular Disease: Mosaicism, Targetable Pathways and Ocular Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Multimodal imaging application of Sturge-Weber syndrome complicated with glaucoma: a case report of non-surgical treatment in a 7-year-old boy.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Salvage of a severed Paul Glaucoma Implant tube via anastomosis with an Ahmed Glaucoma Valve in a child with Sturge-Weber syndrome and complicated glaucoma: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Modifiers of perceived stress in caregivers of children with Sturge-Weber syndrome: a cross-sectional, single-site study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Coping Strategies and Sense of Care Among Parents of Children Affected by Sturge-Weber Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) is a rare form of neurocutaneous disorder characterized by the involvement of neurologic, cutaneous and ocular problems. Among all SWS-related ocular abnormalities, glaucoma is the most common complication with a bimodal onset time. The occurrence of gene mutations in GNAQ has been identified as a cause of SWS. Recent studies have indicated that macrophages and mutations in GNA11 or GNB2 are also involved in the pathogenesis of SWS. Different mechanisms such as elevated episcleral venous pressure and focal venous hypertension can result in SWS secondary glaucoma (SG). In addition to glaucoma-related manifestations, SG may be associated with the typical site of facial port-wine birthmarks, choroidal vascular malformation and other ocular features. Medication and surgery are still the mainstay for SG. ROCK inhibitors have shown good performance in the control of intraocular pressure in SG but have not been verified in large sample populations. Due to the anatomical abnormalities, the incidence of surgical complications is higher. Non-penetrating surgical procedures, known for their safety and hypotensive characteristics, may be preferable instead. In general, the treatment of SG is a challenging undertaking. Early detection and treatment are crucial to preserve the visual function of patients with SWS. This review provides an overview of its pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, therapeutic agents, surgeries, and recent advances in the field of SG. The aim is to offer the latest perspectives and insights for the understanding and diagnosis of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.