Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241119›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Effectiveness of virtual clinical learning in nursing education: a systematic review.

Abdalkarem Fedgash Alsharari, Dauda Salihu, Farhan Faleh Alshammari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdalkarem Fedgash AlsharariDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka, 72388, Saudi Arabia. afalsharari@ju.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8911-3356
Dauda SalihuDepartment of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Jouf University, Sakaka, 72388, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8651-7323
Farhan Faleh AlshammariCollege of Nursing, University of Hail, Hail, 81451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3722-4457

Funding

Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Jouf University DGSSR-2023-01-02477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the development of technology in education, simulations, virtual and online technologies are being incorporated into nursing education, especially for clinical education. This was especially necessary when an event occurred that did not necessarily allow for face-to-face contact, such as Covid-19, disasters like typhoons and others. However, limited resources for clinical education of nurses can contribute to the challenges of incorporating and appropriately utilizing virtual clinical learning technologies. Nursing education has been driven by the use of virtual learning technologies such as virtual reality, augmented reality, immersive virtual reality simulation, mixed reality, among others, which are delivered using tablets, phones or computers to create a lived experience for an intended learning outcome. This review aims to examine their effectiveness in terms of core professional competencies, problem solving, nursing process and communication skills.

methodsThis systematic review was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis. Experimental peer-reviewed articles (randomized controlled trials, and quasi-experimental studies with one to two or more groups (pre-/post-test) using e-simulation technology for nursing education and assessment were included. PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched. The search duration was from inception to 30th April 2024.

resultsVirtual simulation technologies could be used for the practical teaching of nursing students. These technologies have been shown to significantly improve problem-solving skills (effect size 0.2 to 0.9), communication skills (effect size 0.4-0.7), and core professional competencies (effect size 0.3 to 0.9) with a small to large effect size.

conclusionThe results indicate that virtual simulation technologies have important benefits for students' learning when integrated into clinical nursing education and practice. Educators should consider the use of virtual learning technologies when revising nursing curricula. It is important that nursing education policy makers integrate the use of virtual simulation into nurse education, and adapting this pedagogical approach could help improve student readiness for effective healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

Nursing educationOnlineSimulationTechnologyVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40241119
PMCPMC12004849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.