ArticleThyroid research2025
Improving fine needle aspiration in value-based thyroid cancer care: an interrupted time series analysis.
Article in Thyroid research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and ultrasound-based optimization of post-FNA management decisions in Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules: a retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundValue-Based Health Care (VBHC) implementation motivates providers to reduce unnecessary procedures to improve outcomes and costs, i.e. VALUE: In thyroid cancer care, adequate use of Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) may prevent downstream diagnostics, costs, and delays in the care process. This study aims to evaluate the impact of needle selection in FNA on Bethesda I classifications, duration of FNA appointments, and care utilization.
methodsIn October 2021, a Modified Menghini-type needle needle replaced the regular syringe needle used for FNA. An interrupted time series (ITS) analysis using generalized linear models was conducted with data from radiology and pathology reports coupled with care utilization data at the patient level. Outcomes included frequency of Bethesda I classifications per month, appointment time, and health care utilization in the first patient year (in 2024€).
resultsBetween July 2020 and May 2022, 345 FNA in 224 patients were included. Implementation of the Modified Menghini-type needle needle was associated with a 78% level decrease in the odds of Bethesda I classification during FNA (OR (95% CI) 0.22 (0.06;0.71)), and, on average, a 4% (1.25 min) reduction in FNA appointment time. Despite a higher FNA unit cost postintervention (additional cost of €17.56 per FNA), there were no changes in the diagnostic and overall costs.
conclusionVBHC implementation provides the tools to identify and monitor improvement projects that enhance the value of thyroid nodule diagnostics and management. Implementing a Modified Menghini-type needle needle in FNA resulted in increased adequate diagnostic results, time savings, and no changes in diagnostic and care costs. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.