ArticleBMC medical education2025
A pilot study on the application of ISOBAR combined with case teaching method in pediatric resident nurses' clinical handover.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient Participation During Nursing Bedside Handover: A State-of-the-Art Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo design and evaluate the model combining ISOBAR communication tool with case teaching method, and to explore its influence on the nursing handover level, clinical work ability, nursing teaching quality and nurses' satisfaction of pediatric resident nurses.
methodsA total of 84 pediatric resident nurses were selected by random sampling and divided into the experimental group (n = 40) and the control group (n = 44). The experimental group implemented the ISOBAR combined with case teaching method, while the control group adopted the traditional lecture method combined with case teaching method. After 2 months of pediatric standardized training, the nursing handover level was evaluated by the Nursing Assessment of Shift Report (NASR) scale, the clinical nursing ability was evaluated by the pediatric and hospital-wide standardized training assessment results, the teaching satisfaction and willingness to continue in nursing work were evaluated by a 10-point satisfaction questionnaire, and the incidence of nursing adverse events in the two groups was recorded.
resultsThe experimental group was significantly better than the control group in dimensions (including patient safety assurance, patient participation promotion, enhancement of nurses' supervision, cooperation and responsibility) and the total score of the NASR scale (P < 0.05). The experimental group also had significantly higher scores in the pediatric and hospital-wide standardized training assessment results and willingness to continue in nursing work (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of nursing adverse events and teaching satisfaction between the two groups.
conclusionThe combination of ISOBAR and case teaching method effectively improves the nursing handover level and clinical nursing ability of resident nurses, and increases their willingness to continue in nursing work. Simple to implement, this model is well worth further promotion. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable, as the study is not a trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.