ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
A data-driven approach to detect support strategies for children living in households receiving public assistance in Japan: a mixed methods study to establish tailor-made health and welfare care.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChild poverty adversely affects children's health and social lives. Children in households receiving public assistance have diverse needs regarding their health and lives Therefore, they require tailored support interventions based on individual sociodemographic backgrounds and other personal attributes. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has identified distinct segments of these children using self-reported data or evaluated the health and social support strategies for the obtained segments. This study aimed to apply a clustering technique to quantitatively identify the distinct segments among children in households receiving public assistance, qualitatively describe the segment characteristics, and suggest potentially effective health and social life support strategies for each segment.
methodsIn the quantitative phase, we used the probabilistic latent semantic analysis (PLSA), a machine learning-based soft clustering method, to identify the segments of children aged 10-15 years in households receiving public assistance. We used the segments obtained in the quantitative phase to subsequently conduct seven semi-structured interviews and one focus group with professionals supporting children with complex needs. The interviewees were asked to describe the segment characteristics and propose health and social life support strategies for each segment.
resultsIn total, 1,275 children were included in the quantitative analysis. PLSA identified all the segments with distinct characteristics that made sense to professionals who supported children in households receiving public assistance, confirmed by qualitative findings: e.g. "children who can do things on their own" (Segment 1), "children living in a facility" (Segment 2), "children who are in hikikomori (social withdrawal)" (Segment 3), "children who cannot be bothered to answer conceptual questions about themselves" (Segment 4), and "children from households with intergenerational public assistance use" (Segment 5). The qualitative findings also suggested various support measures not only for physical health but also for the social and mental health of children in households receiving public assistance, for example, "financial support for higher education" for Segment 1, and "whole family support" for Segment 5.
conclusionsChildren in households receiving public assistance can be categorized into distinct segments and would consequently benefit from tailored support strategies for their health and social lives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.