Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241088›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2025

Disease candidate genes prediction using positive labeled and unlabeled instances.

Sepideh Molaei, Saeed Jalili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sepideh MolaeiComputer Engineering Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed JaliliComputer Engineering Department, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. sjalili@modares.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying disease genes and understanding their performance is critical in producing drugs for genetic diseases. Nowadays, laboratory approaches are not only used for disease gene identification but also using computational approaches like machine learning are becoming considerable for this purpose. In machine learning methods, researchers can only use two data types (disease genes and unknown genes) to predict disease candidate genes. Notably, there is no source for the negative data set. The proposed method is a two-step process: The first step is the extraction of reliable negative genes from a set of unlabeled genes by one-class learning and a filter based on distance indicators from known disease genes; this step is performed separately for each disease. The second step is the learning of a binary model using causing genes of each disease as a positive learning set and the reliable negative genes extracted from that disease. Each gene in the unlabeled gene's production and ranking step is assigned a normalized score using two filters and a learned model. Consequently, disease genes are predicted and ranked. The proposed method evaluation of various six diseases and Cancer class indicates better results than other studies.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDiseaseGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeoplasmsDisease gene predictionGene expression profilePositive-unlabeled learningScore relevanceSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID40241088
PMCPMC12004746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.