Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241078›Full record

SynthesisBMC oral health2025

Comparative analysis of bacterial abundance and diversity in tumour tissue of oral squamous cell carcinoma and non-tumour tissue: insights from a systematic review of 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing.

Swagatika Mohapatra, Swagatika Panda, Neeta Mohanty, Bibhu Prasad Mishra

Abstract readSystematic ReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Swagatika MohapatraDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Swagatika PandaDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. swagatikapanda@soa.ac.in.
Neeta MohantyDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Bibhu Prasad MishraDepartment of General Surgery, Maharaja Krushnachandra Gajapati Medical College and Hospital, Berhampur, Odisha, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs per the recent research findings, there is a significant difference between the bacteriome of normal tissue (NT) and tumor tissues (TT) of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Identifying this distinct bacteriome is crucial for understanding their potential contribution to oral carcinogenesis. This systematic review (SR) aims to identify exclusive and relative bacterial abundance and bacterial diversity in TT and NT. METHODOLOGY: The review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PUBMED and SCOPUS databases were searched for studies in English published till 31st August 2024. The inclusion criteria focused on identifying bacteriome in NT versus TT at either species,/genus, and/or phylum level through 16 s ribosomal RNA sequencing. Quality assessment was performed using an eleven-parameter tool combining the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and customized criteria.

resultEvaluating the selected 13 articles, we have identified the exclusive and relative abundance of bacteriome in TT and NT at phylum, genus, and species levels. Three phyla such as Chloroflexota, Deinococcus-Thermus, and Mycoplasmatota, are found exclusively in TT. Seven genus such as Eubacterium, Campylobacter, Aeromonas, Oceanivigra, Rheinheimera, Weissella, and Catonella are exclusively found in TT. Ten species such as Micrococcus luteus, Prevotella melaninogenica, Exiguobacterium oxidotolerans, Fusobacterium naviforme, Staphylococcus aureus, Veillonella parvula, Parvimonas sp oral taxon 110, Eubacterium II G1 infirmum, Eubacterium XI G3 Brachy, Weissella viridescens are found in TT. Six genus such as Capnocytophaga, Selenomonas, Leptothrix, Desulfovibrio, Desulfoplanes, Pelospora are found exclusively in NT. Eleven species, such as Streptococcus sp. Oral taxon 071,Selenomonas sputigena, Treponema pedis, Acholeplasmatales bacterium, Capnocytophaga haemolytica, Eubacterium sp., Syntrophomonadaceae genomosp.,Treponema putidum, Mitsuokella sp., Actinomyces sp. Oral taxon 848 str. F0332, p- 2534 - 18B5-gut-group are found in NT. Seven common genera within which different species are identified in TT and NT, suggesting differences in bacterial behaviour and characteristics within the same genus. A total of 12 phyla, 35 genera, and 54 species were found to be relatively more abundant in TT compared to NT. Conversely, 7 phyla, 32 genera, and 45 species were relatively more abundant in NT than in TT. Considerable variations in diversity metrics were found between TT and NT.

conclusionThis systematic review is the first to identify a distinct bacteriome exclusive to OSCC tumour tissue compared to normal tissue using 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing. This pioneering work lays the foundation for future studies on the oral microbiome as a potential diagnostic or therapeutic target in oral cancer management. It emphasizes the importance of exploring species-level differences for a deeper understanding of their roles in OSCC.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

BacteriaCarcinoma, Squamous CellMouth NeoplasmsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SHumansMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16 s ribosomal RNA sequencingBacteriaBacterial abundanceDiversityOral squamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID40241078
PMCPMC12001643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.