Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241068›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Patient safety education in undergraduate medical education through a global lens: a scoping review.

Njoud Aldardeir, Qabirul Karan Abdullah, Linda Jones

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Njoud AldardeirCentre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. nfaldardeir@fcms.edu.sa.
Qabirul Karan AbdullahCentre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Linda JonesCentre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient safety, an organizing framework to minimize risks and harm to patients in healthcare delivery, is broadly accepted as a crucial component of global undergraduate curricula. The incorporation of Patient Safety Education (PSE) into medical curricula, as suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO) can be challenging and has been partially and inconsistently applied. Factors such as densely packed curricula, gaps in the evidence-base, under-prepared faculty, and low levels of organizational support have influenced implementation. This review highlights teaching and learning evidence relevant for such integration of PSE into undergraduate medical education and considers variations in educational advancement across different regions referred to as WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich and Democratic) and Non-WEIRD countries.

methodsWe followed the JBI protocol for undertaking scoping reviews to identify evidence-based gaps and recommend further research supporting integration of PSE into undergraduate curricula. Using PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, CINAHL and Cochrane library, 720 papers, from 2013 to 2023, were identified. Screening of titles and abstracts of 61 studies of PSE in undergraduate medical programs, 28 articles met the inclusion criteria. Descriptive statistical and thematic analysis for data extraction about curriculum design, learning and teaching interventions was conducted.

resultsFindings showed 39% of 28 papers reviewed originated in European region, and 36% from the Americas. Over half (57%) of the selected studies used quantitative methods of analysis, 37.4% were mixed methods, and only 3.5% used qualitative approaches. A variety of methods were used including interactive (21.4%), experiential (14.3%) and technology-enhanced (17.8%) pedagogic strategies. The WHO curriculum guides, and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) were the common sources shaping the content of the interventions. Four themes were identified, cultural and contextual considerations; curriculum structure/session design; student engagement/ application; leadership support and faculty training.

conclusionsMost publications and discourses emerged from WEIRD countries. Whilst outlining a range of pedagogical methods and curricular design, few explicitly referenced educational theories or addressed faculty development needs. Greater attention to cultural perspectives, local adaptation, efficacy of implementation strategies is needed globally. Research into longitudinal studies and impact on educational institutions will aid our understanding of how to promote, create and evaluate PSE across diverse countries. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, Medical, UndergraduatePatient SafetyGlobal HealthHumansGlobal differences in patient safety educationMedical curriculum integrationMedical studentsMedical teachingPatient safetyUndergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID40241068
PMCPMC12001576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.