Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40241044›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Enhancing patient safety: identifying fall risks during patient transfers in operating rooms.

Kübra Okuyucu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kübra OkuyucuDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Amasya University, İpekköy Campus, Amasya, 05100, Turkey. kubra.okuyucu@amasya.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransfers within operating rooms present significant risks to patient safety, with falls potentially leading to serious consequences for both patients and staff. The aim of this study is to explore the factors contributing to falls during transfers and strategies to enhance patient safety in operating rooms.

methodsThis is a qualitative study conducted using semi-structured interviews with fifteen operating room staff including nurse (n = 7), anaesthesia technician (n = 7) and scrub person (n = 1). Their ages ranged from 28 to 39 years, with experience years in the operating room ranging from two to ten years. The data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach based on the grounded theory.

resultsThe thematic analysis identified six key factors contributing to falls during patient transfers: human error, team coordination, patient condition, staffing challenges, equipment issues, and inadequate training. Participants recommended improving team collaboration, pre-operative patient education, better infrastructure (e.g., private elevators), hands-on training, and increased staffing. Additionally, policy changes to limit complex outpatient transfers were suggested to reduce risks.

conclusionsThis study provides valuable insights into the risk factors and potential prevention strategies regarding falls during patient transfers in operating rooms. Future research should incorporate multidisciplinary observational studies involving human factors to provide deeper insights. It is recommended to create systems for anonymous incident reporting and implement comprehensive training programs.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsOperating RoomsPatient SafetyPatient TransferAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatient Care TeamQualitative ResearchRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsFallsOperating roomPatient safetyQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID40241044
PMCPMC12001615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.